别焦急，我们也可以选择ChatGPT来帮助我们审阅论文，鉴于它接管字数有限，可以有两种办法实现：
01.分批次将论文内容输入给ChatGPT，
02.AskYourPDF第三方插件直接上传论文。
接下来，我们可以让ChatGPT对论文进行细致的评审，并供应针对性的修正建议。在输入论文内容后，我们须要明确指示ChatGPT进行评审。
AIPaperPass - AI论文写作辅导平台
评价论文的逻辑性和连贯性：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊评审专家，请剖析文本逻辑与连贯性，并供应改进流畅性和段落联系的建议。同时，给出句子修正见地，以提升整体质量和可读性。但无需供应原始文本。
English Prompt：
As a top-tier journal reviewer, please analyze the logic and coherence of the text, and provide suggestions to improve its fluency and paragraph connections. Additionally, suggest sentence modifications to enhance the overall quality and readability of the text. However, there is no need to provide the original text.
评价论文构造：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊评审专家，评估这篇论文的组织构造清晰度，确认其弁言、方法、结果、谈论和结论是否逻辑连贯，确保读者能明确理解作者的研究目的、履行办法、紧张创造及这些创造的深层意义。同时，请供应具有培植性的批评见地。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, I will evaluate the clarity of the organizational structure of this paper. I will confirm whether its introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion are logically coherent, ensuring that readers can clearly understand the author's research objectives, implementation methods, key findings, and the underlying implications of these findings. Additionally, I will provide constructive criticism to help improve the paper's overall quality and readability.
研究方法是否适当：
中文指令：
你作为顶级期刊的评审专家，请剖析此论文的研究设计科学性及合理性，核实所采取的方法和实验设计与研究问题的契合度，并评估样本量的充足性。同时，请提出具有批驳性的改进建议。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, I will analyze the scientificity and rationality of the research design in this paper. I will verify the appropriateness of the methods and experimental design in relation to the research question. Additionally, I will assess the sufficiency of the sample size used. Finally, I will provide critical suggestions for improvement to enhance the overall quality of the paper.
谈论是否适当：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊的评审专家，对这篇文章的谈论部分就下面几个问题进行评审：
1.谈论是否与实验结果符合？
2.谈论内容是否基于实验结果，没有超出其支持范围？
3.是否包含未证明的假设或推测？
4.有哪些不雅观点缺少充分论据？
5.是否深入阐明了实验结果？
6.与现有研究有何联系？
7.与其他研究比较，结果有何异同？
请供应对谈论部分的批驳性见地。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, I will evaluate the discussion section of this article based on the following criteria:
1.Does the discussion align with the experimental results?
2.Is the discussion content grounded in the experimental results, without exceeding their scope of support?
3.Does the discussion contain unconfirmed assumptions or speculative claims?
4.Are there any viewpoints lacking sufficient evidence or argumentation?
5.Does the discussion provide a thorough interpretation of the experimental results?
6.How does the discussion connect with existing research?
7.How do the results of this study differ or align with those of other studies?
Please provide critical feedback on the discussion section based on these questions.
核对结果数据：
中文指令：
请将结果部分中报告的数据与表格中的数据进行比拟，并针对结果部分中可能存在的偏差进行改动。在比拟过程中，如果创造有不一致或不合理的地方，请提出培植性的批评见地。
English Prompt：
Compare the data reported in the Results section with those presented in the tables, and make corrections to any deviations found in the Results section. If there are any inconsistencies or unreasonable aspects, please provide constructive criticism.
从揭橥角度评判整篇论文：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊的评审专家，依据揭橥标准评估此篇文章，并提出详细的修正建议。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, please evaluate this article based on the publication standards and provide specific suggestions for improvement.
ChatGPT虽可助我们进行常规检讨并供应见地，但无法替代履历丰富的专家。专家的一句指示每每能揭示文章的打破点，使思维豁然开朗，提升文章档次。若让ChatGPT剖析普通文章，恐难提出有深度的见地。
分外福利！
Special Welfare
听说你还没有写论文？
恭喜你！
超级更加幸运儿！
AI PaperPass是你最好的选择！
为什么选择AI PaperPass写论文？
AIPaperPass - AI论文写作辅导平台
情由一：利用超级大略方便
只需供应【学科】+【论文题目】
3个步骤，10分钟
轻松一键天生几万字论文真的很省心